NOTE: I have an update to this essay describing a repair technique we are using successfully on many trucks beginning in the summer of 2015. Read more here
The 2003-4 Discovery was one of Land Rover’s most successful models. Unfortunately, significant problems have begun cropping up as the trucks have aged. I’ve written quite a bit about the engine block problems, which got a great deal worse in the late 4.6 models.
The 2003-4 Discovery was one of Land Rover’s most successful models. Unfortunately, significant problems have begun cropping up as the trucks have aged. I’ve written quite a bit about the engine block problems, which got a great deal worse in the late 4.6 models.
Now we are seeing a new problem – frame deterioration. This is a particular concern in trucks that
are driven off road in mud and then on road in winter New England. The frames
of these “affordable” Land Rovers are suddenly rotting out. My investigation of frames was precipitated
by one truck that came here with rust after we’d looked at it and seen nothing at all the summer before. The rust that
came through this winter was so severe that the owners (and myself, frankly)
had a hard time understanding how it could appear so quickly.
I looked into what went wrong with that truck, and compared
it to six other Discovery II models at Robison Service last week. What I found is, to say the least, troubling.
Take a look at this photo of the rear underside of a typical
Discovery II. You can see some surface
rust in this photo, but it’s nothing alarming.
Yet a closer inspection reveals cause for concern. If you look at the frame rails you see they
have a weld running down the bottom centerline. This weld is rough on the
inside, so it can trap debris if it gets into the frame. The next problem is the braces for the
trailer hitch. The points where they
bolt to the frame rails act as barriers, also trapping dirt inside the rails.
Underside of a 2004 Discovery showing beginnings of chassis rust |
Now we get to the hidden part of the problem . . . I took
this situation to our Land Rover tech support contacts, who told me something
pretty surprising. It turns out Land Rover reduced the frame thickness of
Discovery II models by more than 30% as compared to the Defender and earlier
models. So the frame in these vehicles
is significantly lighter than the frames of earlier Rovers, which were
themselves no paragons of corrosion resistance.
This was done to save weight and gas but it has had the result of making
them weaker and less durable.
To add insult to injury, it turns out Land Rover decided not
to galvanize these frames so there is little to prevent them from dissolving if
corrosives get inside.
Corrosion inside a Land Rover frame, see with an inspection camera |
Another unpleasant result of this weight reduction is that
the thinner frame rail walls are now fracturing from metal fatigue up front
where they are exposed to heat cycling from the catalytic converters. The shock towers are another weak point. The truck we got in last week announced its
problems by breaking a rear shock mount.
But an examination of six other DII examples at our shop showed stress
cracks in the same location is three more vehicles – this is a problem that
will rear its head for lots more people soon.
Note the vertical line of fatigued metal to the left of the upper shock bolt. A breakage waiting to happen |
Off road enthusiasts have long known that mud can accumulate
in frame rails, and they should be washed clear after driving in mud. In fact, Land Rover frames have holes in the
low spots to allow mud to drain.
Unfortunately, the DII frames don’t drain fully because of the rough
welds on the bottom, and the passage of some bolts that act as barriers. When a frame gets filled with mud, and the
truck is then driven on salted winter roads, the salts get concentrated in the
mud and they destroy the frame from inside faster than I would have believed
possible.
This is a serious weakness that is made very apparent with the increased use of liquid snow melter on snow country roads. When that stuff gets into the mud inside a frame it stays damp and its incredibly corrosive. And the inside of the frame typically has no protection.
This is a serious weakness that is made very apparent with the increased use of liquid snow melter on snow country roads. When that stuff gets into the mud inside a frame it stays damp and its incredibly corrosive. And the inside of the frame typically has no protection.
The ultimate cure for these trucks is going to be the
fitment of heavier galvanized frames, like we to with Defenders today. However the lower value of the Discovery II
models is going to make that decision a tough one for many owners. I suspect frame rust will send quite a few of
these trucks to the scrap yard. But
there will be enthusiasts who fix them, just as there are enthusiasts who pay
us to rebuild engines, transmissions, and everything else on these trucks.
With restored Defenders costing over $100,000 and scruffy examples selling in the $40s a Discovery II with a rebuilt motor and galvanized frame starts to look like a more comfortable and good performing alternative that's almost as trail worthy and a lot more road worthy. Doing a frame in that context, along with a top hat or flange liner engine makes a lot of sense. Add some trail mods and you are still under $40 with both usability and a lot of capability.
Rovers North has just started selling galvanized DiscoveryII frames. It will be interesting to see
how the changeover works out. These
trucks have more “Stuff” underneath than a Defender. I would not be surprised if a frame change
takes 100 hours and a pile of bushings, mounts, lines and pipes. Frame replacement is likely the most
expensive repair one could undertake on these vehicles, potentially exceeding
the cost of a flange liner 4.6 engine job.
(c) 2014 John Elder Robison
John Elder Robison is the general manager of J E Robison Service Company, independent Land Rover restoration and repair specialists in Springfield, Massachusetts. John is a longtime technical consultant to the Land Rover, Mercedes, BMW, Porsche and Rolls Royce Owner's Clubs, and he’s owned and restored many of these fine vehicles. Find him online at www.robisonservice.com or in the real world at 413-785-1665
7 comments:
Hi John,
In your above article you reported "It turns out Land Rover reduced the frame thickness of Discovery II models by more than 30% as compared to the Defender and earlier models".
Does this apply to all Discovery 2 frames (versus thicker on all Discovery 1 and Defender models) or only to the last model years of Discovery 2. If the latter, which model years are affected?
Thank you for your time!
Regards from South Africa - where the Land Rover greet is still a salute!
Hendrik
Hendrik, I was told all the DII models have the thinner frames. But something changed for the worse in 2003, both with respect to frames and engines - both suffered a marked drop in quality/durability. At least that's what we see in our service dept.
Thank you, John, for your prompt response!
Real pity - the last Disco 2's with the face lift were really handsome looking vehicles. Furthermore, the older ones will easily cost more than their value to repair/rebuild/restore, taking into account other weak points on these vehicles.
I need to buy a workhorse 4X4 on a tight budget and with Defenders rising in value and still not my favourite daily driver, I am now probably forced to consider restoring a Range Rover Classic and fit a 300tdi in order to try and maintain a balance between variables like economy, simplicity, operating costs and comfort.
So I have a chance to buy a meticulously dealer maintained 03 disco with 115k miles... only for road use and I plan to continue the meticulous service... for like 4 grand... should I be scared, avoid it, or go for it??
Nickstone - my advice is, check it before buying. Will it need frame repair soon? And don't buy unless you accept the reality that you will probably be looking at a $13k engine overhaul in the next few years. If that's unacceptable, my advice is to pass.
I have a 2000 Dll that suffers severe frame rot! It's pretty much isolated to the rear section from the rear axel back to the bumper. It's a shame because in all other regards my truck is A1 from interior/exterior to engine. I saw that you sell frame sections vs. the entire frame. Given that I'm in Indiana what would the purchase of a partial frame cost to buy/ship? I read the repair would run 2k-6k, but I would have to have the repair done locally. I just need the replacement partial frame only.
Thank you, Tracey
I have 213k on my '03 Discovery...The only issue I've run into is changing out the headliner because I had a sunroof leak. And the engine compartment looks as new as when I bought it. I also had to have my drivers' seat reupholstered and my rear bumper replaced with a steel one. Someone apparently couldn't parallel park properly and cracked the old one...but that was at 180k. I know four people with well over 160k on their '99-04 Discoverys.
Granted, we are up here in Bellingham Washington where you'll find more pristine Ute's than you can imagine. Washington state doesn't use salt on the roads and west of the Cascades you won't have much snow anyhow.
And I've got friends in Vermont that drive Land Rovers and Land Cruisers and they don't have much rust problems...the rusts is there, but it's not attacking the integrity of their vehicles.
Of course, they all own pressure washers.
I guess it's just a matter of taking care of one's vehicle. I've heard where most just have a head gasket job and they're fine for another 50k...All these horror stories must be coming from people who just plain and simply run their Disco's ragged or are kids who "pump" them up. Which is ridiculous.
Post a Comment