What do you do when your car pours gasoline on the
ground? Do you run, light a match, or
call your mechanic? That is the question
for today’s service insight.
Ethanol has snuck into automotive fuel systems over the past
20 years, with some states blending more than 10% into the gas you buy. They say it’s an invisible change, and that
may be true, but it’s not without consequence for your vintage car.
Newer cars (those made in the past 10 years) are designed to
use 10-20% ethanol without damage. Older
cars are not so tolerant. Ethanol can
react with the rubbers used in hoses and seals, and cause them to crumble. When that happens you have leaks, or worse.
Here is an example – a 1996 Bentley Turbo. This car would be fuel-tight most of the
time. But every now and then – usually
when it was cold – the car would gush fuel at a frightening rate. As you can see, the engine bay in this car is
jam-packed, and you can’t see the fuel line connections. But they are in there.
A day of disassembly revealed the culprit – crumbled o rings
on the lines that carry fuel into the injector rails. There are four of these seals on this engine,
and they all looked like this.
What about the other seals?
Carmakers buy their parts from a multitude of vendors. In this case Rolls Royce Motors bought the
fuel injectors from Bosch, and the fuel hoses from a supplier in the UK. The Bosch injectors (Bosch being a more
forward looking company) were supplied with o-rings rated to withstand 20%
ethanol for 20 years, and they are fine.
The fuel pipe seals have no rating at all, or none we can
find, and they failed.
Are there other lines and seals that can go bad in this
car? Maybe. It’s hard to know. The ethanol attacks hoses and rings from
inside, so we won’t see the problem until it becomes a blowout. Knowing that. I think I’d replace the fuel
hoses on the car with new ethanol-rated line.
That brings up another problem. Many of the service parts for vintage cars
are new-old-stock, meaning they were made years ago and stored. If those new/old lines are not made from
ethanol resistant hose they are no better than what’s on the car now. You may have to have new hose fabricated from
modern ethanol rated line stock to solve the problem properly.
This is a significant safety hazard that every old car enthusiast should know about.
Some people ask if there are ethanol-free fuels. Aviation fuel is ethanol free, as is racing gas. However both are costly and neither are legal for road use. More importantly, if ethanol is the standard gas in your area, you would be wise to manage your car as if ethanol is going in the tank regularly. Be prepared, because that's smarter than being broken. Or being burnt.
John Elder Robison is a NY Times bestselling author and the founder of J E Robsion Service of Springfield, MA. Robison Service is a long established Bosch car service specialist, with expertise in BMW, Jaguar, Land Rover, Mercedes, Porsche, and Rolls Royce/Bentley motorcars. Find them online atwww.robisonservice.com or in the real world at 413-785-1665
4 comments:
Hello John,
What is your opinion on the 2006 MY Range Rover L322. They already use Jaguar engines and 6 speed gearboxes, yet they don't have Terrain Response and have mechanical handbrake. Could this be the best of both worlds? Do they still use the old transfer box with the torsen in it?
Another plus point for the 2006 is that when you convert it to coils you don't have to hack in to its wiring to install any module, you just pull out a couple of fuses.
I agree with what you say but I would not call the lack of Terrain Response a plus. That system works great and does not cause trouble, in my experience. The electric parking brake, on the other hand . . .
CEO of Prodigy Oil and Gas, Mr. Shawn Bartholomae, has his own ideas about the ethanol
debacle unfolding right before our eyes. Pieces continue to come to light about the
government's use of ethanol mixed with gasoline to help promote US energy independence.
"All the ethanol brouhaha began before the US's resurgence into the oil and gas market place,
says Bartholomae.
Post a Comment